Job Description

Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week

n

Check out this Loom video for more details: share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5

n

We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with contemporary coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.

n

This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.

What this role actually is n

You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:

n

n
- Whether the response makes sense
n
- Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
n
- Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
n
- Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
n

n

This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.

What you'll be doing n

n
- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end
n
- Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think
n
- Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code
n
- Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)
n
- Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading
n
- Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code
n

What we mean by "taste" n

n




- Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
n
- Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
n
- Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
n
- Would this interaction build or erode trust?
n

n

You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.

Who you are n

n
- Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
n
- Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python
n
- Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor
n
- Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
n
- Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line
n
- Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement
n
- Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
n
- High bar for what good engineering looks like
n

Nice to have n

n
- Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
n
- Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
n

Engagement details n

n
- Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location
n
- Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible
n
- Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well
n
- Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat
n
- Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview
n

#J-18808-Ljbffr

📌 Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - AU (City of Gold Coast)
🏢 G2i
📍 City of Gold Coast